Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Eurogenes presents Kurdish and Assyrian data

Davidski from Eurogenes Genetic Ancestry Project was so kind to focus on the Kurdish and Assyrian samples in his latest update of the project and compared them with available autosomal data of 23 populations. For this he used a program called SupportMix that helps determining ancestral origin of genomic segments.
 
For those who are interested in the who is who: Here is the key for most Kurds

Kurd4=KD007 Kurmanji (Zakho)
Kurd5=KD023 Kurmanji (Dohuk)
Kurd6=KD013 Sorani (Koysinjaq)
Kurd7=KD012 Sorani (Sulaymaniyah and Darband)
Kurd8=KD009 Sorani (Sulaymaniyah)
Kurd9=KD008 Yezidi (Iraq)
Kurd10=KD024 Zaza (Dersim)
Kurd11=KD014 (Sulaymaniyah)

For more information about the individuals, see results of
HarappaWorld
Dodecad K12b
Eurogenes K12b
McDonald


Update:
The given names of the segments are somehow surprising, anyways, here is the summary of the first 5 chromosomes. Note: Calculated percentages take into account the different sizes of each chromosome.

I also sorted it by region:

Please note the higher percentages of Kurds for Iranians, Europeans and South Asians (mostly Indo-European). The Northeast Caucasian connection is stronger for Kurds, while the Northwest Caucasian connection is much stronger for Assyrians. Even though the signal for Northwest Caucasian is not strong, this is something I have seen in the Y-Chromosome, too.
Y chromosome of Kurds in Iran
Kurdish Y chromosomes of a Central Anatolian village

Update2:

Now, all chromosome are analyzed, here are the results, sorted by region:

Overall, Kurds and Assyrians are pretty similar, the previously observed differences (see above) shrinked, e.g. the higher percentages of Kurds for Europeans shrinked, the difference compared to Assyrians is only obvious for Ukrainians, the values for "Tuscan" is nearly the same. The clearest difference can seen for "Saudi_Arabian" and for South Asia.  The Northeast-Caucasian signal is pretty high for both.

Thus, I decided to show the same analysis but sorted by the differences between Kurds and Assyrians.

Assyrians share more with "Saudi_Arabian", "Palestinian", "Abkhasian", "Druze", "West Asian Jewish", and "Moroccan", so Assyrians are closer to Semitic language speakers + NW-Caucasian speakers.

Contrary, Kurds share more with "Brahui_Balochi", "Chamar_Kannadi_Kol", "Iranian", "Pathan", "Chechen_Lezgin", "Ukrainian", "Brahmin-Kshatriya", "Buryat_Tuvan", "Chuvash", and "Tuscan", so besides the Altaic and Dravidian language speakers, Kurds are closer to Indo-European language speakers and NE-Caucasian speakers.

Interestingly, Assyrians are not closer to Armenians, Syrians and Cypriots as previously stated elsewhere, suggesting a complex ancestry of these populations without a clear Semitic domination in the past.

Summary:
Kurdish ancestors have seen more of the world.

3 comments:

  1. Honestly these results seem rather odd. We seem to lean more towards Arab speaking populaion then to Caucasians and Iranians?

    So I take these results with a grain of salt as all other projects seem to paint a different picture. Also I am Kurd2 on the project, how can I calculate my results?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Honestly these results seem rather odd. We seem to lean more towards Arab speaking populaion then to Caucasians and Iranians? "

      That's why I wrote "The given names of the segments are somehow surprising"

      I don't think that Kurds or Assyrians are somehow Saudi-Arabian. I think that the annotation for "Saudi_Arabian" and "West_Asian" is not stable and can flip to another group easily.

      "Also I am Kurd2 on the project, how can I calculate my results?"

      I will let you know.

      Delete
  2. "Also I am Kurd2 on the project, how can I calculate my results?"

    If I understood it correctly, then the raw data of each chromosome are in outSupportMix.Probs.tped (you are in column K and L), the results are in outSupportMix.tped, and the key for the results are in outSupportMix.population_legend.txt (e.g. "14" = Tuscan).

    ReplyDelete